Participants additionally had been expected if they had ever involved with a number of tasks linked to lesbian, homosexual

Participants additionally had been expected if they had ever involved with a number of tasks linked to lesbian, homosexual

Fundamental Demographic Traits and Other Background Variables

Details about respondents’ age, competition and ethnicity, residence, location, and home structure was regularly gathered by Knowledge Networks in prior questionnaires. The current survey included a concern asking perhaps the respondent ended up being presently on active army responsibility, a part associated with the armed forces Reserves or National Guard, or even a veteran that is military.

Intimate Orientation Identification

As noted previously, all participants had reported these were homosexual, lesbian, or bisexual for a formerly administered KN questionnaire. The survey that is present by having a screening question that asked respondents “Which of this following most useful defines your sexual orientation?” and provided five choices arrayed for a continuum from homosexual to heterosexual. For male participants, your options had been (a) gay or homosexual; (b) bisexual, mostly interested in guys; (c) bisexual, equally drawn to gents and ladies; (d) bisexual, mostly drawn to females; (e) heterosexual or straight. For females, the very first reaction choice ended up being lesbian, homosexual, or homosexual, and choices (b) and (d) had been transposed.

Respondents were asked how old they are if they first knew about their intimate orientation (“How old were you when you initially knew or decided you had been gay/lesbian/bisexual?”) and once they first disclosed it to some other individual (“How old were you the very first time you told somebody else you are gay/lesbian/bisexual?”). These people were afterwards expected whether their mum or dad knew about their intimate orientation and, if relevant, just how many of the siblings and brothers knew about any of it. In addition, utilizing a scale that ranged from 0 ( maybe not at all out to any one of them) to 7 (totally out to all of them), participants reported the level to that they had been “out of this cabinet (openly L/G/B/Q/H)” to six extra teams: (1) “other family members maybe perhaps not your instant family members,” (2) “your current heterosexual (‘straight’) friends,” (3) “your casual acquaintances who will red tuobe be heterosexual (‘straight’),” (4) “heterosexual (‘straight’) buddies that you knew you work with on a daily basis (other than your boss or supervisors) before you came out,” (5) “your boss and other supervisors at work,” and (6) “the people.” A “doesn’t apply to me” reaction choice had been included for every single team.

Participants additionally had been expected if they had ever involved in a number of activities linked to lesbian, gay, or bisexual problems, including general general public expressions of viewpoint (“Wore a switch, posted an indicator, or displayed a bumper sticker”); taking part in a rally, march, or demonstration; contacting a federal government official; and contributing cash up to a lesbian, gay, or bisexual company or cause. This a number of concerns had been accompanied by a synchronous group of items which asked perhaps the respondent had participated in identical activities for “a non gay problem or cause that is, something perhaps not associated primarily to homosexual males, lesbians, or bisexuals. for contrast purposes”

Political and involvement that is religious

Information regarding participants’ political party affiliation and ideology (liberal, moderate, conservative) was indeed formerly gathered by Knowledge Networks. When it comes to current study, participants had been expected whether or not they had voted when you look at the latest (2004) presidential election and, if that’s the case, for which candidate. They certainly were additionally expected for details about their spiritual denomination, regularity of attendance at religious solutions throughout the past one year, exactly exactly how much guidance faith provides within their time to time living, and (for respondents whom reported affiliation having a spiritual denomination and any attendance at spiritual solutions) the degree to which their congregation includes lesbian, homosexual, and bisexual people.

Relationships, Marriage, and Family

Participants were expected their relationship that is current status their legal marital status, and exactly how numerous young ones they usually have (including used kids and stepchildren). Participants currently in a relationship (including those that had been hitched) had been expected the gender of the partner. Those that had been in a relationship yet not hitched had been expected whether or not they were cohabiting therefore the likelihood they might marry their partner if their state had been allowing exact same intercourse marriages (this conditional clause ended up being omitted for participants in Massachusetts, the only real state where marrying a exact same intercourse partner ended up being appropriate during the time of information collection). People who are not currently in a relationship had been expected whether or not they would choose to marry someday.